#Defense zone 3 rebalance full#

Meanwhile, the offensive realism maintains that the international system is full of dissatisfied or revisionist great powers in which surely will exploit the change of the balance of power to challenge the dominant to achieve the global hegemony ( Mearsheimer, 2001, p.

Where it holds that the main trait of the balance of power in the international system is the persistent change given the persistent change of the states’ capabilities too.

In addition, the aforementioned, the hallmark of offensive realism lies in its focus on the balance of power in the international system. Survival is the main goal of the great powers ( Mearsheimer, 2001, pp. The offensive realism presents five hypotheses to prove that the pursuit of the hegemony is the ideal way for the great powers to secure their survival: These strategies would be containment or preventive wars or offshore balance to undermine the potential threatening power ( Goswami, 2013, p. Where the great powers forced permanently to adopt offensive and expansionist military strategies whenever possible to secure their survival ( Wong, 2016, p. Because the rivalry among the great power for hegemony is endless. In this way, the offensive realism holds a pessimistic vision of the international system. Because of this hegemony the best way to secure their survival ( Mearsheimer, 2001, p. Mearsheimer (2001), the rivalry among the great powers for hegemony is a constant feature in the international system. The focus of the offensive realism only on the rivalry among the great powers in the international system. Thus, the defensive realism has a more optimistic vision than the offensive realism for the international system because it holds that the security is abundant. The offensive realism affirms that the maximization of power is for hegemony rather than the security to secure their survival in the anarchy system. While the defensive realism holds that the main goal of states is to maximize its power for security so as to secure their survival. John Mearshimer offered the offensive realism theory to challenge the defensive realism. In his book, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. The study also examines whether the rebalance is a containment strategy against China’s rise, and the significance of the SCS in this regard too. In this respect, the study examines whether China is a revisionist power or a status quo power, and the significance of the SCS in this regard. Thus, this study seeks to analyze the nexus of the US rebalance strategy to Asia and China’s strategy in the SCS from the perspective of offensive realism. On the other hand, this shift in the balance of power greatly clarifies why China since 2008 has transformed its strategy in the South China Sea (SCS) to a clear offensive strategy in which was intensified under president Xi Jinping. Especially, since the financial global crisis in 2008, the global balance of power has gradually become tilted in favor of China. The latter, by which the USA will undertake a large-scale redeployment of its military power in Asia-Pacific and establish new security alliances has greatly suggested that rebalance was designed to contain China’s rise in Asia. Rebalance strategy consisted of three main elements, economic, diplomatic and military/security. Obama described the strategy as a broad shift of the USA’s attention from the Middle East to Asia-Pacific given the huge geostrategic significance of the latter to the US priorities. President Obama declared the rebalance strategy to Asia. In his speech before the Australian parliament on November 17, 2011. Because the dominant power in the international system will strive hard to undermine that potential regional hegemony so as to secure its survival as a global dominant. Therefore, the offensive realism holds that the rise of a potential regional hegemony would not be peaceful at all. This change encourages the revisionist power to pursue the regional hegemony that facilities the global hegemony so as to secure its survival. Offensive realism maintains that the balance of power in the international system in a constant change. The offensive realists contend that China is a revisionist power rather than a status quo power as the liberals claim. The implications of China’s rise were greatly debated. The full terms of this licence may be seen at Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Published in Review of Economics and Political Science.

Defense zone 3 rebalance